Neal provides a link to this Chicago Tribune story (sorry, it’s passworded — see www.bugmenot.com for “preview options”…) which summarizes what’s being whispered in newsrooms around the world for about the past week: “Could Bush be right?” Certainly it’s too soon to attempt to come to any conclusions about Iraq or Afghanistan, but with each passing day of progress questions as to the reality of all of this become increasingly nonsensical: it is reality. And the world is now having to wake up to the fact that the events that have happened in the wake of Afghanistan and Iraq — revolution in Lebanon against Syria, the first inklings of real progress in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, rumblings of fairer elections in Egypt and Saudi Arabia — have as their primary catalyst the determined actions of the United States in Iraq …and behind those actions, the leadership of George W. Bush. Even the increasingly unbridled defiance of Iran could be a good sign: those tyrannies with the loosest grip on power will be those most willing to work with the new direction of things (Syria, Egpyt), while a country like Iran would most likely respond with greater and greater threats when it at last recognizes that the heavy artillery of freedom is being re-loaded and re-aimed.
I believe history will indeed place George W. Bush alongside Ronald Reagan: a principled man who recognizes evil when he sees it and is unafraid to act against it. The Left in this country has certainly already laid some of the first stones in the road towards making that comparison valid, what with their daily kneejerk vilifications of W and their lame jabs at his intelligence — just as they did to Reagan, 20+ years ago.
UPDATE: Jeff Jacoby makes some similar observations.